Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

Chat, flirt and fantasise about everything wet and messy

Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

Postby BillShipton » 25 Nov 2010, 11:10

Hi

Our hosts tell us they have 'fixed' the problems that have been causing our disappearance over the last week or so. We shall see. The Pup is working on getting it to look the way it did.

Our apologies to all those who (like me) have been frustrated by a frequent absences.

Bill
User avatar
BillShipton
 
Posts: 4371 [ View ]
Joined: 23 Apr 2006, 20:21
Location: Sunny St Leonards-on-Sea

Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

Postby Candy Custard » 25 Nov 2010, 11:15

Thanks for the update Bill, hope it stays back for good now xxxx
User avatar
Candy Custard
 
Posts: 1218 [ View ]
Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 03:11
Location: Custard Towers, UK

Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

Postby Miss T » 25 Nov 2010, 12:33

BillShipton wrote:Our hosts tell us they have 'fixed' the problems.....Our apologies to all those who (like me) have been frustrated by a frequent absences.

Bill


Hosts....*mutter, mutter, mutter* I know exactly how you feel...
Resistance is futile!
User avatar
Miss T
 
Posts: 732 [ View ]
Joined: 15 Nov 2006, 23:03

Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

Postby iainecgunge » 25 Nov 2010, 14:57

Probably jinxing ECgunge by saying this, but we've had a good run of late with ours... Although they do moan a bit because our forum is huge (they've upped the size limit for forums I think largely as a result of us!) Hardly my fault people keep posting, indeed if they didn't our hosts would be getting paid as we'd have nothing to host! Nothing more annoying than trying to view your own site and discovering it's not there.
ECGunge - my little corner of the web, home to some great fiction, a huge clips archive and quite a bit more!

Gunge Mistress We've got messy all tied up! :)
iainecgunge
 
Posts: 32 [ View ]
Joined: 27 Sep 2010, 07:48
Location: Surrey, UK

Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

Postby Richard » 25 Nov 2010, 22:40

I don't care what it looks like so long as it doesn't go away altogether. Although I might be away myself for a little while so please don't think I have abandoned you all :) .

(You can say good riddance if you like! :P )
Bottoms Up!
User avatar
Richard
 
Posts: 2201 [ View ]
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:42
Location: Southampton UK

Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

Postby BillShipton » 26 Nov 2010, 09:19

We'll miss you, Richard!

Note to everyone else: Yippee. No worrying about the niceties of grammar for a while!
User avatar
BillShipton
 
Posts: 4371 [ View ]
Joined: 23 Apr 2006, 20:21
Location: Sunny St Leonards-on-Sea

Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

Postby Richard » 27 Nov 2010, 23:11

BillShipton wrote:We'll miss you, Richard!

Note to everyone else: Yippee. No worrying about the niceties of grammar for a while!

I heard that!
When I return from my professorial tour of the ancient empires of the Mediterranean I shall expect your essays to be ready for marking! Anyone failing to do so may expect a visit to one of the stern mistresses of this academy for appropriate punishment.
Shipton magnus; do not expect that your status as prefect (now known as 'moderator')will exempt you from disciplinary action. Report immediately to the games mistress, Madame Hayley!
Bottoms Up!
User avatar
Richard
 
Posts: 2201 [ View ]
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:42
Location: Southampton UK

Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

Postby andy250 » 28 Nov 2010, 00:02

Have a good time Rich.

regards

Andy and the team.
andy250
 
Posts: 4586 [ View ]
Joined: 13 May 2006, 19:56
Location: Manchester

Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

Postby WamNick » 28 Nov 2010, 00:18

Glad you are back; hopefully for good - I don't care much for "the other place"

Welcome Back ! - oh that's another song by John Sebastian...
Last edited by WamNick on 28 Nov 2010, 12:39, edited 1 time in total.
WamNick
 
Posts: 45 [ View ]
Joined: 22 Apr 2007, 13:33

Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

Postby BillShipton » 28 Nov 2010, 12:11

Oh God, we are probably now obliged to pay some money to Gary Barlow! Tough, Gary!
User avatar
BillShipton
 
Posts: 4371 [ View ]
Joined: 23 Apr 2006, 20:21
Location: Sunny St Leonards-on-Sea

Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

Postby WamNick » 28 Nov 2010, 12:40

BillShipton wrote:Oh God, we are probably now obliged to pay some money to Gary Barlow! Tough, Gary!


Sorry Bill ! - have amended post
WamNick
 
Posts: 45 [ View ]
Joined: 22 Apr 2007, 13:33

Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

Postby BillShipton » 28 Nov 2010, 13:35

I was only joking! The chances of him finding it are somewhat small!
User avatar
BillShipton
 
Posts: 4371 [ View ]
Joined: 23 Apr 2006, 20:21
Location: Sunny St Leonards-on-Sea

Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

Postby WamNick » 29 Nov 2010, 15:23

BillShipton wrote:I was only joking! The chances of him finding it are somewhat small!



Thanks Bill - still you don't want to mess with the BMI, SESAC, ASCAP or the PRS. I should have known better from my days working for the BBC.
WamNick
 
Posts: 45 [ View ]
Joined: 22 Apr 2007, 13:33


Return to General WAM Banter

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

cron