Hi
Our hosts tell us they have 'fixed' the problems that have been causing our disappearance over the last week or so. We shall see. The Pup is working on getting it to look the way it did.
Our apologies to all those who (like me) have been frustrated by a frequent absences.
Bill
Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)
Previous topicNext topic13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)
Thanks for the update Bill, hope it stays back for good now xxxx
Sessions https://candycustard.com WAM instructions https://wamstructions.com
-
Candy Custard - Posts: 1218 [ View ]
- Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 03:11
- Location: Custard Towers, UK
Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)
BillShipton wrote:Our hosts tell us they have 'fixed' the problems.....Our apologies to all those who (like me) have been frustrated by a frequent absences.
Bill
Hosts....*mutter, mutter, mutter* I know exactly how you feel...
Resistance is futile!
Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)
Probably jinxing ECgunge by saying this, but we've had a good run of late with ours... Although they do moan a bit because our forum is huge (they've upped the size limit for forums I think largely as a result of us!) Hardly my fault people keep posting, indeed if they didn't our hosts would be getting paid as we'd have nothing to host! Nothing more annoying than trying to view your own site and discovering it's not there.
ECGunge - my little corner of the web, home to some great fiction, a huge clips archive and quite a bit more!
Gunge Mistress We've got messy all tied up!
Gunge Mistress We've got messy all tied up!

- iainecgunge
- Posts: 32 [ View ]
- Joined: 27 Sep 2010, 07:48
- Location: Surrey, UK
Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)
I don't care what it looks like so long as it doesn't go away altogether. Although I might be away myself for a little while so please don't think I have abandoned you all
.
(You can say good riddance if you like!
)

(You can say good riddance if you like!

Bottoms Up!
Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)
We'll miss you, Richard!
Note to everyone else: Yippee. No worrying about the niceties of grammar for a while!
Note to everyone else: Yippee. No worrying about the niceties of grammar for a while!
-
BillShipton - Posts: 4371 [ View ]
- Joined: 23 Apr 2006, 20:21
- Location: Sunny St Leonards-on-Sea
Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)
BillShipton wrote:We'll miss you, Richard!
Note to everyone else: Yippee. No worrying about the niceties of grammar for a while!
I heard that!
When I return from my professorial tour of the ancient empires of the Mediterranean I shall expect your essays to be ready for marking! Anyone failing to do so may expect a visit to one of the stern mistresses of this academy for appropriate punishment.
Shipton magnus; do not expect that your status as prefect (now known as 'moderator')will exempt you from disciplinary action. Report immediately to the games mistress, Madame Hayley!
Bottoms Up!
Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)
Glad you are back; hopefully for good - I don't care much for "the other place"
Welcome Back ! - oh that's another song by John Sebastian...
Welcome Back ! - oh that's another song by John Sebastian...
Last edited by WamNick on 28 Nov 2010, 12:39, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)
Oh God, we are probably now obliged to pay some money to Gary Barlow! Tough, Gary!
-
BillShipton - Posts: 4371 [ View ]
- Joined: 23 Apr 2006, 20:21
- Location: Sunny St Leonards-on-Sea
Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)
BillShipton wrote:Oh God, we are probably now obliged to pay some money to Gary Barlow! Tough, Gary!
Sorry Bill ! - have amended post
Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)
I was only joking! The chances of him finding it are somewhat small!
-
BillShipton - Posts: 4371 [ View ]
- Joined: 23 Apr 2006, 20:21
- Location: Sunny St Leonards-on-Sea
Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)
BillShipton wrote:I was only joking! The chances of him finding it are somewhat small!
Thanks Bill - still you don't want to mess with the BMI, SESAC, ASCAP or the PRS. I should have known better from my days working for the BBC.
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests