stonecastle wrote:<censored>
Oh dear, looks like someone's been at the brandy again...
(Loved your followup Candy btw!

stonecastle wrote:<censored>
stonecastle wrote:Candy why not get another woman to take big mouthfuls of custard and then spit it in your face until you are covered in it.
stonecastle wrote:Candy why not get another woman to take big mouthfuls of custard and then spit it in your face until you are covered in it.
splat182002 wrote:Everytime Stonecastle makes an outrageous comment we then have another 5 pages of replies castigating him which, in truth, bores the pants of me, and, I am sure, most other people.
Its really quite simple. Give him a red card and ban the tosspot. Personally, I think he is a very rude, arrogant and ignorant twerp.
By God I feel better having said that
NX-74205 wrote: I think you and DD both topless and smothered in mess would be good. Love to see you in shaving foam, sometime, just straight out the can or is that too kinky!![]()
NX
Richard (sotonude) wrote:NX-74205 wrote: I think you and DD both topless and smothered in mess would be good. Love to see you in shaving foam, sometime, just straight out the can or is that too kinky!![]()
NX
I wonder if you have thought out the full implications of that NX?
1) A special panning camera would be required if they were side-by-side.
2) Most monitors wouldn't be wide enough to see the picture.
3) Bill and DM1 say we shouldn't post extra wide pictures.
![]()
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 164 guests