Top Secret This Morning Mission

Chat, flirt and fantasise about everything wet and messy

Re: Top Secret This Morning Mission

Postby matt2matt2002 » 14 Mar 2010, 10:32

Not sure if this bit should go into a new topic but since a few folk have commented on how sploshing can or may not have a sexual element............
There is a piece in todays Scottish Sunday Mail on Donna Savage who runs CSK's 2 offices in Scotland.
They run event marketing in shops.
Quote: 'Stunned staff were ordered to pelt their failing colleagues with custard pies'
'The best sales people pied the worst.'

So here we have a case of sploshing being used to motivate / humiliate folk

Not nice.

Or is it? I like the humiliation aspect of sploshing.

Please discuss and use both sides of the paper.
:wink:
I think sex is better than logic
but I can't prove it.
User avatar
matt2matt2002
 
Posts: 980 [ View ]
Joined: 24 Aug 2006, 09:39
Location: Scotland, the Splosh centre of the world - not.

Re: Top Secret This Morning Mission

Postby La Perla » 14 Mar 2010, 10:39

Orgasmic, oh yes. Sexually oriented, definitely. Kinky, I guess so. A fetish, mmmm. Chat about it in public - NO.

I agree with messyanthony's comments [see above] and I certainly go along with messymaddy's enthusiasm.

I think the visual stimulation which I very much enjoy from observing Sploshing [as performed by Messymaddy, Hayley, WAM Princess, Messy Jessie, Gilly Sampson, Louise Hodges, Nina, GooGodess and many others] is a real erotic turn-on.

The sensory pleasure I get from participating in such activity is also sexually arousing. I like to combine my sploshing with crossdressing so I'm not going to set myself as a target on TV or anywhere else. I think Eddie Izzard is great, I'm not a fan of that potter/artist chap (Grayson Perry?) but he can do his own thing quite happily in my book; they're using the publicity machine to their advantage, well done.

Participation and visual stimulation together really float-my-boat. I don't splosh unless I'm crossdressed, I do enjoy the feel of 'letting myself get dirty', I like the 'naughtiness', I'm over-the-moon with creamy sensations and I really enjoy the ruining of something [an image] that has taken time, effort and cost to produce.

Yes, for me, its sexual. When I'm dressed-up, it's all about pleasure; the feel, the (mild) humiliation and the (token) distress. I love a great-looking, decorated plate of creamy food to be rubbed against my genitals.

I'm not going on television to say that! OK, I'm a hypocrite - add that to the list of my faults.
Make every day a messy day.
La Perla
 
Posts: 65 [ View ]
Joined: 03 May 2007, 12:05
Location: London

Re: Top Secret This Morning Mission

Postby BillShipton » 14 Mar 2010, 13:28

La Perla wrote:I'm not going on television to say that! OK, I'm a hypocrite - add that to the list of my faults.


I don't think anyone is being hypocritical by not appearing. As seems to be agreed, everyone has a different degree of confidence in how open they are about sploshing. Nobody is right or wrong here.

I am pleased that some of you at least think it is right that the subject at least gets represented on shows of this kind (even if it is usually by me). Just as well really cos it looks like sploshing will be appearing on Friday's show with me talking about it alone (including the sexual side). So, right now I need all the support I can get! Live network telly is a first for me too and I'm bricking it!

Biggest disappointment is that being on Friday I don't even get to meet Holly!
User avatar
BillShipton
 
Posts: 4371 [ View ]
Joined: 23 Apr 2006, 20:21
Location: Sunny St Leonards-on-Sea

Re: Top Secret This Morning Mission

Postby easy_as_ » 14 Mar 2010, 14:23

BillShipton wrote:
Biggest disappointment is that being on Friday I don't even get to meet Holly!



I would imagine that that was fairly deliberate. Not not meeting you, Bill, but given Holly and MOM, she might have felt a little uncomfortable and she can't be unaware of the attention she has garnered.
In fact I was a little amused that she might be even talking about it prior to you revealing Holly won't be there.

Still, that said, good luck with the show Bill.

I am sure there will be a positive response to the whole idea of getting messy in general, not just in a sexual way.

:D
Who ate all the pies ? What a waste of pie !
User avatar
easy_as_
 
Posts: 451 [ View ]
Joined: 24 Apr 2006, 15:12
Location: London

Re: Top Secret This Morning Mission

Postby sweetnpied » 14 Mar 2010, 17:21

messyanthony wrote:I dunno i dissagree. Its very sexually linked to me. WAM gets me off. I have zero interest in watching regular porn. I rather watch a women cover and fil her dress with chocolate. Anytime I see a messy scene it makes me horny. Anytime i have a session with myself its for pleasure. Ill make myself into a huge slop of a mess then get off. Never once in my life can i tell you that i did it for fun or to be silly. Its always to get off. That being said. I have a girl friend who i have never had messy sex with once and knows nothing of my fetish and i have zero problem having normal sex. I dont NEEED to have wam to get myself off. I just love it. If i was alone all my life and could have solo sessions all i wanted i would be sexually content aswell. They both make me cum equally hard.

MA, I am with you, hun, that everything with me about wam is totally linked to my cumming either alone or with my hubby. I'm just acknowledging that it's other things for other people as well. And I had gone a few years without it, and that was okay. So I didn't NEED it to have sex. But I can tell you, now that I've returned to it recently, it's been fuckin' rockin' my world!!!
User avatar
sweetnpied
 
Posts: 298 [ View ]
Joined: 02 Jan 2010, 22:37
Location: northeast usa

Re: Top Secret This Morning Mission

Postby Curiousholly » 14 Mar 2010, 20:36

Richard wrote:
Curiousholly wrote:Hello all,


We are looking for a couple who get messy or a couple where one person likes to get messy or alternatively... A couple who aren't romantically involved but perhaps instead are good friends that splosh together.

With love,
(Curious)Holly

x

Doesn't this paragraph cover all possibilities?


Haha. Richard it's an amazing paragraph.
Curiousholly
 
Posts: 20 [ View ]
Joined: 31 Dec 2008, 12:28

Re: Top Secret This Morning Mission

Postby NINA » 15 Mar 2010, 12:22

Opps should have read this thread before posting a new one as I've been invited along but I'm not part of a couple. Perhaps I'll have too play the male and the female of a couple?
User avatar
NINA
 
Posts: 249 [ View ]
Joined: 26 Jan 2010, 11:35
Location: SOMERSET

Re: Top Secret This Morning Mission

Postby Mike Nomic » 15 Mar 2010, 14:14

This thread seems to have taken over from http://www.splosh.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=5588 so I'll post on this one too.

Splosh forum membership: 3574
Members using pseudonyms: 3570 plus
Members showing a location: under 800
Genuine couples: very few

Picture the scene: -

'I have with me (insert real names), (insert ages), a (insert profession) and (insert profession), from (insert location), a genuine sploshing couple'.

Blah, blah, blah - on national mainstream daytime TV, with an audience of millions, including potentially family, friends, acquaintances, family of work colleagues who will recognise you from the last drunken works Xmas bash - not to mention the possibility of vindictive ex-partners; coupled with the likelihood of further coverage in the tabloid press, so that work colleagues who won't see the programme can catch an eyeful too, and then look up the programme and replay all the gory details on the internet.

Even if one uses assumed names, etc, somebody out there in audience land is going to say 'I know that face/those boobs/that laugh/that voice - that's (insert real name), and we're back to square one.

It ain't go happen, is it?

No.

Regrettable, but that's life. If I'd won the jackpot on the lottery and didn't have to work again, and had a partner available in a similar situation, I might be tempted, but I haven't, I don't, and I'm not. I work (when I do) in a very staid profession and could possibly be 'drummed out of the Brownies' for such a thing. In my spare time, I'm involved in interests where enhanced CRB checks are required, and that would almost certainly be prejudiced (unjustifiably) by such an episode - think, for instance, a large part of the population still think that all homosexual men are paedophiles!

No, it's not going to happen - not yet, anyway.

Mike.
Last edited by Mike Nomic on 15 Mar 2010, 22:17, edited 1 time in total.
Normality is subjective!
User avatar
Mike Nomic
 
Posts: 484 [ View ]
Joined: 02 Jul 2006, 18:40
Location: Bristol, UK
Fetlife: Mike Nomic
UMD: Mike Nomic

Re: Top Secret This Morning Mission

Postby zoegunge » 15 Mar 2010, 17:48

I think work is a major factor for anyone... I would probably lose my job as a teacher if it were seen... even if I didn't lose my job, the kids would have an absolute field day with it... I don't think I could face them ... these things should not be shared with them!

It's a shame- anyone who went on would have to be very comfortable with themselves and 'out' in the first place I would have thought. None of my friends know about my interest- and an outing on TV would not be the way to tell them. I would not want to be the talk of pub gossip. It's not that I am ashamed of it, I'm not, but there are some things I would like to keep secret.

I hope you get someone on the show- would be very interesting to see.
zoegunge
 
Posts: 62 [ View ]
Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 19:43

Re: Top Secret This Morning Mission

Postby mrsniffles » 15 Mar 2010, 18:11

I'm sure if 'This Morning' were offering to pay the couple then perhaps Sploshers might be more tempted!?!?

Mrsniffles
Tights look better when messy and ripped :-)
mrsniffles
 
Posts: 156 [ View ]
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 18:14
Location: Up Norf

Re: Top Secret This Morning Mission

Postby Mike Nomic » 15 Mar 2010, 18:34

mrsniffles wrote:I'm sure if 'This Morning' were offering to pay the couple then perhaps Sploshers might be more tempted!?!?

Mrsniffles


Bill Shipton wrote:Hi

I had a phone call last night from ITV's "Good Morning" (with Holly & Phil) who are doing a week looking at sex starting 13th Mar. They would very much like to include sploshing and would love to find a sploshing couple prepared to come on and be interviewed about it (along with me) by Holly & Phil themselves on 16th Mar. It would be live (so in the morning!), shot in London, and they would pay all expenses and maybe a small fee. They assure me that it would be treated in a non-judgmental way and only areas you wish to discuss will be used (it's not an expose), but obviously this would be appearing on national TV so people will see it. If you are interested, please PM me. No timewasters, Holly obsessives or video producers after free publicity please.

Bill


They are, and they're not.

Mike.
Normality is subjective!
User avatar
Mike Nomic
 
Posts: 484 [ View ]
Joined: 02 Jul 2006, 18:40
Location: Bristol, UK
Fetlife: Mike Nomic
UMD: Mike Nomic

Re: Top Secret This Morning Mission

Postby mrsniffles » 15 Mar 2010, 19:01

Mmmm...???

Not sure when they say and maybe a small fee!!! Would be more tempting had they disclosed how much, or how little as the case may be!

Mrsniffles
Tights look better when messy and ripped :-)
mrsniffles
 
Posts: 156 [ View ]
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 18:14
Location: Up Norf

Re: Top Secret This Morning Mission

Postby sweetnpied » 15 Mar 2010, 21:56

Mike Nomic wrote:'I have with me (insert real names), (insert ages), a (insert profession) and (insert profession), from (insert location), a genuine sploshing couple'.

Blah, blah, blah - on national mainstream daytime TV, with an audience of millions, including potentially family, friends, acquaintances, family of work colleagues who will recognise you from the last drunken works Xmas bash - not to mention the possibility of vindictive ex-partners; coupled with the likelihood of further coverage in the tabloid press, so that work colleagues who won't see the programme can catch an eyeful too, and then look up the programme and replay all the gory details on the internet.

Even if one uses assumed names, etc, somebody out there in audience land is going to say 'I know that face/those boobs/that laugh/that voice - that's (insert real name), and we're back to square one.

It ain't go happen, is it?
Mike.

Well, if they were willing to fly somebody over from the States, the likelihood of anonymity would increase. But I doubt hubby would even feel safe then.
User avatar
sweetnpied
 
Posts: 298 [ View ]
Joined: 02 Jan 2010, 22:37
Location: northeast usa

Re: Top Secret This Morning Mission

Postby Candy Custard » 16 Mar 2010, 07:42

I... like many wish I could do this but unfortunately (as mike mentioned) the vindictive ex partner factor would stop me. Theres no way on earth he would ever grasp that sploshing doesn't mean I am an incapable/irresponsible/terrible parent to our teen daughter.

This is the man who gave me YEARS of grief, yes YEARS! after I appeared live on channel 4 in 1998 at Newmarket races talking to John McCririck, saying I had bet 'a fiver here and there' (I just went to get him to sign my race card and ended up on telly)

Apparently this meant I was gambling away all the maintenance he gave me... see....? And I hadn't even personally bet anything, I had just said it for the sake of the cameras. YEARS of grief over something as tiny and insignificant as that!!

Just an example of the twats some of us girls are dealing with here.

If I had no responsibilities I would do,

but I do and so really can't

I am cheering from the sidelines for Bill though... best of luck and all my admiration to anyone that can manage to get on there! xxx
User avatar
Candy Custard
 
Posts: 1218 [ View ]
Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 03:11
Location: Custard Towers, UK

Re: Top Secret This Morning Mission

Postby BillShipton » 16 Mar 2010, 08:51

Thank you for your support, Candy. Assuming the item goes ahead I shall be doing it but I fully understand people in sensitive jobs or with sensitive partners might not want to. However Mike's assertion that appearing on daytime TV for ten minutes at 11am all but means you will have to ask the government for a new identity afterwards is a bit over the top. Daytime TV shows (no, not the Jeremy Kyle type) are full of people talking sensibly about everything from cookery to sex. They do not have audiences of 'millions', and not everybody who watches them has a lynch mob mentality. As for the dubious statistic that the majority of people still think all homosexuals are paedophiles, surely the way to overcome ignorance is by informing. The more sploshing remains undiscussed the more people will think we have something to hide.

Like I say, I fully understand people having their individual reasons for not doing it, but I did want to correct the idea that you will instantly become a social outcast if you do.
User avatar
BillShipton
 
Posts: 4371 [ View ]
Joined: 23 Apr 2006, 20:21
Location: Sunny St Leonards-on-Sea

Previous

Return to General WAM Banter

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests

cron