Mud: the pros and cons?

Chat, flirt and fantasise about everything wet and messy

Re: Mud: the pros and cons?

Postby musikmann100 » 01 Jun 2009, 17:52

Claymore_wam wrote:Which satellite sites do you use, musikman? I know of Google Earth but can't think of any others.

RE:Quarries. I'm not clear as to why there would be clay pools at sand and gravel quarries? Surely they'd be full of sand and gravel wouldn't they? Also, aren't these places all locked up and with cctv or security guards or whatever, or are they just left wide open 24/7?

C_W.
Apart from google maps and google earth you can also use multimap.com which is very good too.They've been updating their imaging recently so some of it is either the same or perhaps newer than google, that said some of it is still quite old (ie. at least 4-5 years old).
Another site to try is maps.live.com although I believe multimap uses exactly the same imagery.
Clay ponds/pools appear at virtually every sand/gravel quarry because an awful lot of water is used to extract the gravel from the earth and it's often in amongst thick/hard clay or earth so the water is used to separate the gravel from the clay and the run-off from this is stored in huge settlement ponds somewhere on the site.The very fine clay particles just sit there suspended in water and over time the pond develops different consistencies of clay in different parts of the pond so some of it (usually the biggest particles) turn into a hard baked surface that's hard enough to walk across without even breaking the top, whilst other areas of the same pond you could easily sink into upto your chest in very fine,soft clay (although beware sometimes the surface may look hard enough to walk on but actually it will easily collapse under feet and you can find your whole leg's been swallowed up to above the knee in a second!).

Where the age of the satellite imaging is crucial is that these ponds can sometimes disappear rather quickly, depending on what the quarry wish to do with the pond.Some can last for ages (ie. years) so long as it's still in use whilst others are abandoned to nature and dry up and grow over in a matter of months so the mapping might just merely tell you where a pond used to be.That said, if the quarry's still operating they may well have started a new pond elsewhere on the site so that's when to keep eyes peeled on the site for another one that's too recent for the mapping.
In some countries numerous noxious chemicals may still be used to separate gravel from clay so these settlement ponds may be genuinely dangerous but the UK is tied into EU regulation that does not permit their use anymore so environmentally-friendly methods are generally used here as elsewhere in the EU which ensures the quarry sites can be returned to nature safely without harming the local ecology once all gravel deposits have been exhausted. Most clusters of small lakes you see just about anywhere were most likely once quarries and gravel pits and many are now used for watersports/fishing/swimming etc., that couldn't happen if harmful chemicals were used at those sites.

The same cannot be said for some other quarrying operations (limestone/iron ore/gypsum etc.) as hard stone cutting usually makes use of powerful chemicals to speed up the rock-breaking so the run-off from these operations is not something I for one would choose to come into contact with, unless someone else knows more about this and can say categorically that they are as clean as gravel quarrying.
Regarding security etc. it would seem that levels of security can vary widely depending on where the quarry is. For example, in an area of higher crime and numerous break-ins you're likely to find a quarry in that area with plenty of warning signs including dogs/cctv/round-the-clock security guards as they guard the expensive machinery,earth movers and what not. Some of this is bluff but some of it isn't. You can usually tell if the quarry entrance is lit at night, if it has very high inpenetrable fencing and if there is a hut that is clearly in use ( lights on after operating hours) it's probably a good idea to steer clear.
On the other hand, in a remote area of lower crime the quarry can be quite open or at least have the minimum legally required fencing-off that makes them a possibility outside operating hours (usually posted at the quarry entrance) and there are some quarries that have bridleways and footpaths that go right through them and are rights of way that were there before the quarrying started there.Some quarries are duty-bound to keep these rights of way intact so you may walk up one of these paths quite within the law and find a quarry all around you and some can be surprisingly open sites too!
Once you have seen enough different sites you will get a feel for what looks good and what looks like it's worth giving a wide berth, there's not really any rhyme or reason to it in that regard other than what your own experience tells you.
Btw, just about all settlement ponds have KEEP OUT signs (and sometimes THIS IS NOT A PLAY AREA) around them and most likely barbed wire too to stop the chances of children playing around or worse in them as this deep clay is treacherous stuff for the those not familiar with it's inherent dangers.It's not hard to see why little ones can get into great difficulties very quickly in one of the these pits so it's definitely best that way and,besides,it's a legal requirement.
musikmann100
 
Posts: 6 [ View ]
Joined: 25 May 2009, 23:27

Re: Mud: the pros and cons?

Postby Lizzie_Claymore » 01 Jun 2009, 23:28

Wow - thanks for an extremely comprehensive and informative answer! Much appreciated.

I'd forgotten about multimap - I tend to use Google maps for most things these days as I've found Multimap very slow and creaky as it loads all those damned flash adverts and so forth!

I must keep an eye out for quarries, though I do feel nervous about the idea of wandering into one. I'm not sure I'd like to be met by an Alsation - I don't think it would be the one to come off worst, especially if I was trying to make a rapid getaway while weighed down with thick clay and in a long skirt! :-)

They also strike me as being not very private - you can usually be overlooked for some distance by people who can see you and approach long before you see them. I prefer to have the opportunity to stay a bit hidden behind trees so that you've got somewhere to dive into if you hear people coming close.

I've recently found a nice little pond which has knee-deep soft clay at its edge with trees on the far side screening the footpath through a field. The only snag is it's about 150 yards from a railway embankment (before it disappears behind trees) with trains every half hour, which is a bit awkward, though anyone spotting me can't get turn up and chase me away, if they do see me (unlike the farmer)! :o
User avatar
Lizzie_Claymore
 
Posts: 846 [ View ]
Joined: 13 Jul 2006, 18:16
Location: North-west England
Fetlife: Lizzie_Claymore
UMD: Lizzie_Claymore

Re: Mud: the pros and cons?

Postby musikmann100 » 02 Jun 2009, 09:52

Lol, I know what you mean!
It's worth remembering, however, that sand and gravel quarries, unlike a lot of other quarries, tend to be located on flat land (alluvial plains around rivers, low-lying areas) and can often be located on farmland that the farmer may have signed over for,say, 20 years. Once he's signed it over it's the quarry company's responsibility so the farmer is not likely to get involved in that patch of land.
Because of their low-lying locations there are strict planning rules in place to landscape a quarry as much as possible so as not to be an eyesore, they are often surrounded by newly-planted trees and/or high earth banks to screen them off from the general view of the countryside.If you look at any submissions for quarrying online (google again), you'll see a comprehensive plan of landscaping is often already in the submission, otherwise the endless objections from the locals will ensure it's rejected, so they have a duty to make it as discreet as possible (ie. if it sits alongside a main road, you'll often not see the quarry from the main road at all, the only clue being a quarry entrance).
This means that they can be very discreet and hidden anyway, and if the clay pond is in a particularly discreet location (even if it looks quite open) the earth banks often hide you from view in any case. In my experience, unless someone is actually in the quarry, chances are no one will see you or even know you're there, but that's why you have to visit the location and not rely wholly on the satellite mapping as this will only tell you half the story.
Alsatians chasing after you is generally not something I've ever encountered as I'm very careful to pick somewhere that is very unlikely to have anybody on site after hours.
Footpaths and bridleways close to/bordering a quarry are also often screened off (high earth banks or trees) so even if someone may be on that path and you're just the other side of the bank in a clay pond, they're not going to know you're there unless you make lots of noise that is!
Dusk is a good time to go as it gives you the added bonus of gradually getting darker, even though you've still got some light left!
musikmann100
 
Posts: 6 [ View ]
Joined: 25 May 2009, 23:27

Re: Mud: the pros and cons?

Postby Lizzie_Claymore » 02 Jun 2009, 22:52

I have to admit that this is sounding more and more appealing!

I also have to admit that dusk does have one disadvantage, as I found out to my cost last week ... midges! I got bitten to death the first time in that pond as it was sunset and I ended up absolutely covered in the little bastards especially as I was trying to get changed afterwards! They all appeared quite suddenly as soon as the sun went behind the trees. Hundreds and hundreds of bites all over my shoulders, neck and arms. (I was wearing a halter neck outfit that time.) At least I knew to take midge repellent the next time, though they still managed to find the 3 square inches in the middle of my back that I had missed!
User avatar
Lizzie_Claymore
 
Posts: 846 [ View ]
Joined: 13 Jul 2006, 18:16
Location: North-west England
Fetlife: Lizzie_Claymore
UMD: Lizzie_Claymore

Re: Mud: the pros and cons?

Postby DungeonMasterOne » 06 Jun 2009, 12:40

There's noting quite like playing in mud. Food and other "studio" gunge is fun, but to stand at the edge of a mudflat or swamp, all dressed up in your favourite sploshing clothes, clean and freshly laundered, knowing that you're about to step into soft, squishy mud that will absolutely cover everything it touches, is a truly amazing experience. And the actually stepping in and starting to get covered bit is even better!
- DungeonMasterOne
- http://www.gungemaster.com - Visit Saturation Hall, the UK's messiest stately home!
- by my hand and seal, as Lady Jasmine commands.
User avatar
DungeonMasterOne
 
Posts: 714 [ View ]
Joined: 19 Nov 2006, 15:05
Location: The City Of Goth

Re: Mud: the pros and cons?

Postby Baron Morgan » 09 Jun 2009, 07:47

I hope this works, as it's the first time I've tried to post a picture to this board, but as promised here is the mud wallow we eventually chose, bearing in mind your excellent advice. As you can see, it was a little chilly but great fun. Thanks!
Attachments
Mud Promo.jpg
Mud wallow
Mud Promo.jpg (472.27 KiB) Viewed 1523 times
Baron Morgan
 
Posts: 7 [ View ]
Joined: 02 Feb 2009, 16:45

Re: Mud: the pros and cons?

Postby Baron Morgan » 09 Jun 2009, 14:32

And another one.
Attachments
Mud Promo.jpg
A big smile.
Mud Promo.jpg (461.11 KiB) Viewed 1495 times
Baron Morgan
 
Posts: 7 [ View ]
Joined: 02 Feb 2009, 16:45

Re: Mud: the pros and cons?

Postby rich_d_rich » 10 Jun 2009, 04:54

Hey nice pics..

I was going to suggest Pagham Harbour, about 20 miles S of Chichester for tidal mud.
( 50°45'44.99"N 0°47'14.12"W)

Or after a few weeks of no rain, there's a good spot on Thursley Gommon, 8 miles S of Guildford, but it needs to unflood.
( 51° 9'6.38"N 0°41'39.40"W - then follow the track and there's a lake on your right, the top end has lots of mud. Unless they've dredged it)
rich_d_rich
 
Posts: 24 [ View ]
Joined: 03 Apr 2007, 09:36

Previous

Return to General WAM Banter

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests

cron