Which layout do you prefer for the Gallery pages?

[muckypup]

Hi all,

Now that we have a server which doesnt fall over at the drop of a hat I have put the link to the gallery back up at the top of the page (Gallery).

I was playing around with various different layouts and I was wondering which one you prefered?

1. More spread out one with more info (Jan - April 2007)
or
2. More compact look (Latest pictures)

Any other comments/suggestions greatfully recieved. (Try not to let Mercedes bum sway you )

Pup

[Spinynorman and Frilly]

Not sure if it is relevant but option two loaded a lot quiker. Anyway option two got our vote on looks.

[Richard]

I prefer the newer version although I do like to see Mercedes bum swaying. Yes I know its a still picture but I've had a few glasses of wine so perhaps its me thats swaying

[Spinynorman and Frilly]

I prefer the newer version although I do like to see Mercedes bum swaying. Yes I know its a still picture but I've had a few glasses of wine so perhaps its me thats swaying

You and me both.

I'm drinking a very nice Chamont Cabernet/Merlot although I have to say that a lady's bottom always seems to send me swaying no matter what.

[driversoft]

I'll go for the compact layout too. Initially, I thought I'd prefer the first option, but its easier to see more of a picture set with the compact option, and then to zero in on an image you like.

[BillShipton]

Ok, pissed moment....

I have been running the pub quiz night. Wrote and presented 60 questions with lots of adlib banter in between, occasionally refreshed by pints of Becks. I know its an ego thing, but had a great time!

Back to the point, I am just so glad that the forum doesn't fall apart any more when a) there are more than 15 people here and b) people want to go to the gallery. But do let us know how you want the gallery including whether you want different sections etc. Like everything on this forum, it's here for you not us.

Bill

[jon42]

I've gone for more compact, it's a bit easier to browse, and I'm not really that fussed about the picture information before I click on it.

[Spinynorman and Frilly]

Sections within the gallery would be good.

[muckypup]

Sections within the gallery would be good.

Sections how? They are grouped by date posted in the forums at the moment and then there are a few "dynamic" ones which show the most viewed/highest rated etc.

I was thinking it'd be good to be able to sort them by mess or something but that would take quite a lot of work!

[Spinynorman and Frilly]

Sections how? They are grouped by date posted in the forums at the moment and then there are a few "dynamic" ones which show the most viewed/highest rated etc.

I was thinking it'd be good to be able to sort them by mess or something but that would take quite a lot of work!

Would it be possible to place them in sections from now on then? Perhaps just broad ones such as wet, messy or nude.

[jon42]

Sounds like a lot of work... at the moment I'd guess they're just automatically added, someone would have to add tags to them to be able to make galleries like that.

[muckypup]

I've tried adding a tagging thing, not sure whether you'll be able to see/use it? Might be quite good, people can just tag the pictures with various keywords as they browse and then you can just view albums of custard, or nude or wet or gilly or what not.

[Spinynorman and Frilly]

What are the chances of having a system whereby if we were to type in:

Gilly, DD and Frilly in latex bikini custard romp with jam and chocolate sauce ending up with that slimy methywotsit stuff that looks like something else with naughty toys.

It would create the pictures for you.

[muckypup]

Not sure we can stretch that far, but if you tagged all the bikini and latex and dd/gilly etc pics you could have albums full of those things all together