Marketing research, Sunny vs. Johnny

View · by **Alec Stickman** » 03 Oct 2008, 03:52

Who do you like better and why? I don't want to lead any answers, but I've got a bit of a mystery here.

View · by **Alec Stickman** » 12 Oct 2008, 04:14

This is pretty much what I expected was gonna happen, since I've seen the sales. Johnny's a gorgeous girl, but for some reason doesn't sell well. She's an old friend and I'd like to see her do well. Wrong fetish I guess. My question is: What makes a good wam model? Cup size?

View · by **PleasePieMeMistress** » 12 Oct 2008, 06:40

Could be substance. Johnny is a hot lass, but Tomatos don't do it for me, I'd like to see Johnny in other substances.
But then again I wouldn't pay to do so because I don't currently have a PC of my own!

View · by **Invicta** » 12 Oct 2008, 09:21

If you're suggesting that pic sets of Sunny sell better than pics of Johnny then it's a mystery to me- they're both lovely girls who I'd be happy to see getting seriously messy

Could there be anything in PPPM's suggestion about substance? I wonder if it would be worth redoing the poll with pics of both girls equally messy, I reckon the result might be closer?

Cup size certainly doesn't matter for me, and Johnny has got a sensational body and a great look, as you say she really is gorgeous- the thought of her with a liberal coating of cream, chocolate and custard is very appealing...

View · by **driversoft** » 12 Oct 2008, 14:59

If we're allowed to be un-PC, dare I suggest it's about femininity? Perhaps an obvious answer, and nothing directly to do with personalities as decisions are being made on looks here, right? Even the name Johnny conjures up masculinity (well, or condoms...), so perhaps is not a good start!

For me at least, WAM works better the more feminine a model appears - I'm not simply restating the 'beautiful model' thing, as femininity doesn't directly equate, and is much more than that.

Just my thoughts anyway - hope I've not offended anyone!

View · by **latexcrossdresser** » 12 Oct 2008, 15:18

if johnny was covered from head to foot in say mud or chocolate i think more people would vote for her.a few squshed tomatos doesn't really do it for a lot of people.......

i will say though that i voted for johnny in the hope she might get covered in mess good and proper!!!

View · by **skipantmudfan** » 17 Oct 2008, 14:53

Yeah, I'd say it's just the substance. Tomatoes = 'meh' in the wam word, for some reason. Otherwise she's fine.

View · by **morepies** » 17 Oct 2008, 15:51

My reaction to Johnny - pretty model: standard poses - happens to be in tomatoes. Not bad.

My reaction to Sunny - pretty model, going at wamming 100% - look at the commitment! 10/10.

Basic questions I always ask - is the girl enjoying sploshing? Does she 'get it' or not? This is what makes the set. A good director helps but some girls are naturals and others simply pretty wall-flowers.

MPP

View · by **ruegger** » 18 Oct 2008, 08:19

Man before I saw her hand I thought that Sunny had 3 boobs in that second pic. Seriously though, both girls look great but the tomatoes aren't messy enough for me.

~ruegger~

View · by **Alec Stickman** » 18 Jan 2009, 05:03

Well, you asked for it, Jenna Wilder (formerly Johnny Love) Propper Messy. I love you guys for giving her a second chance

www.clips4sale.com/store/20217

my favorite is part 3

View · by **MessyGuyNC** » 18 Jan 2009, 10:51

Sorry man, pretty late to this thread, but figured I would toss in my two cents anyways. Personally, I think Johnny is a completely hottie and I would purchase (if I had the funding right now) any WAM material with her in it!

But the big thing you need to remember is WAM is a fetish, and a fetish is a sexual attraction to materials and objects not conventionally viewed as being sexual in nature. So when your talking about WAM, your talking about the substance and not the girl. I think your problem then isn't with Johnny.... but rather the substance.

Which means, in the latest picks you just posted..... you got a winner!

View · by **latexcrossdresser** » 18 Jan 2009, 11:24

these are some good photos!!!!!!she looks much better completely covered than just a few tomatos.......wouldn't mind to mess her up myself!!

View · by **La Perla** » 18 Jan 2009, 14:01

Both ladies undoubtedly have their fans and each are attractive. Tomatoes are not immediately a major stimulus.

However, asked to choose, I would always favour the model without piercings. I am just not attracted to such adornment.

In fact, it's a real 'turn off'. So, on the evidence before me, Sunny is the favourite.

View · by **Invicta** » 18 Jan 2009, 23:25

Alec Stickman wrote:Well, you asked for it, Jenna Wilder (formerly Johnny Love) Propper Messy. I love you guys for giving her a second chance

www.clips4sale.com/store/20217

my favorite is part 3

Oh yes, that's much more like it- as you say, proper messy, and looking gorgeous. I like those pics a lot

Marketing research, Sunny vs. Johnny

Sunny or Johnny?

Marketing research, Sunny vs. Johnny

i thought so

you asked for it

Sunny is the better for me

Re: you asked for it

Who is online