by DungeonMasterOne » 10 Jul 2008, 00:30
I see several takes on this:
1. Arranging something where the person with the fetish is the one who's getting gunged. So someone who is into sploshing sets up an event where the public can pour buckets of beans over the splosher for a fiver a go, with the proceeds to charity. I think that'd be fine, as no-one bar the splosher themselves is getting gunged. From the public's POV, whether the sploshee enjoys the gunge or not doesn't really matter.
2. Arranging an event where several sploshers splosh each other, in front of a paying audience, with the proceeds going to charity. Again, no problem, the participants all know about the fetish side, the public are getting the entertainment they've paid for as advertised.
The problems only start, as Hayley said, if an event is arranged that encourages members of the public to get sploshed, by someone who's main objective is to "trick" people into being gunged without realising that the organiser is enjoying the results for reasons other than fundraising.
This is where it does get into proper ethical territory - while the outside world probably wouldn't notice, there's a subtle difference between someone with a splosh fetish organising a messy participation event and a non-splosher doing so.
- DungeonMasterOne
-
http://www.gungemaster.com - Visit Saturation Hall, the UK's messiest stately home!
- by my hand and seal, as Lady Jasmine commands.