Splosh Virgin + 5 litres of custard!

[Dick Custardly]

Looks like you both had a great time, thanks for for sharing you pics...

Here's to many more messy sessions in the future!!

[stonecastle]

Where is her face? I like to see a woman get gunge all over her face.

[stockingman]

Where is her face? I like to see a woman get gunge all over her face.

I suspect it maybe on the front of her head..........but i might be wrong!!

Great pics glad you both enjoyed it, i know i enjoyed seeing them.

[DecadentDoll]

cracking missus there...and well done for telling her, honesty is the key!

xxx

[ragingplum]

Ha! Maybe next time we'll do face-gunging. I think everyone is shy at first!

[Sploshman]

Well done mate

[gungergurusd]

nice work fella

[Invicta]

We stopped taking pictures at this point. I think you can guess why...

I'm not surprised.....I'd have done the same Great pics, looks like you had a great time- and your wife is lovely

[Mike Nomic]

Where is her face? I like to see a woman get gunge all over her face.

Thanks, Stonecastle - that is a little softer in tone than many of your messages; however, it remains hopelessly unrealistic and shows a deep lack of understanding of the female mind.
Glamour models, film, TV and music celebrities don't welcome the constant attention of the media: they have areas of their life that they would like to keep off camera or out of the tabloids. Similarly the 'girl next door', having been persuaded to participate in a minority interest probably does not want her face on even a speciality forum like this, at least not in the first instance.

Did do an interview with them but didn't want it to be put in the magazine or for them to show my full face.

Even Sploshman (who is not these days exactly backward in coming forward) did not want his face in a magazine - and that was only a year ago.
I chatted several times in the seventies with Dr. Chris Gosselin of the London Institute of Psychiatry during his research into a book he published in 1980/1 entitled 'Sexual Variations: Fetishism, Sadomasochism & Transvestism'. To brutally precis one lengthy discussion about the different psychological nature of men and women, he told me '98% of men are fetishists (of one sort or another); the other 2% are liars. 2% of women are fetishists and 98% are liars'. Under hypnosis or under the influence of 'truth drugs' women had freely discussed their kinks, fetishes, predilections and what really rocked their boat. The great majority (approx 98%) would later deny flatly (many of them blushing deeply) that they had said any such thing, despite the available evidence.

So, this will remain a male-dominated forum; females will tend to be about scarce as rocking horse droppings, and should be treated with the greatest respect and consideration; they should not be subjected to outlandish demands or told what they should or should not do.
If you haven't yet noticed, the harder you push the more resistance and negative feedback you will generate. My (then) wife and I knew a couple from the home counties back in the eighties; he was an avid mud fan and was trying to get his wife involved, but pressurised her too much and got nowhere. As an aside, he'd even devoted the spare bedroom of their (council!) flat to his endeavours, having filled it with a plastic-clad framework into which he'd poured hundreds of gallons of 'mud' to a depth of a good two feet. His mud was rather 'agricultural' in origin, and had a distinct whiff of manure about it. He treated it with large quantities of Jeyes fluid, which while it may have sanitised somewhat, actually made the smell worse, and it all had to go. We were invited to visit them, and in the course of the evening, I casually chatted to her about our idea of having a football match on the mudflats near Bridgwater, and asked her if she were to take part what she might fancy wearing; she talked enthusiastically about the notion, several possible outfits, asked about depth, consistency, local hotels, made suggestions for other similar events and was generally positive about the whole scenario.
Softly, softly catchy monkey!

Many of the models (professional and amateur - if I may term the wives and girlfriends thus) on here use pseudonyms and change other details (location, age, etc) in order that their true identity and (particularly for the WAGs) the nature of their interest should not enter the public domain.

So, few women, fewer faces, and please - no spitting.

Wake up and smell the coffee.

Mike.

[RexBeans]

luvverrly jubberly.

[eden]

I hope the Mr doesnt see these pics, I am not purchasing wellies

Nice pics x

[eden]

I hope the Mr doesnt see these pics, I am not purchasing wellies

Nice pics

[muckypup]

What superb pictures. Your wife has a very nice body, all the better with the lovely outfit and custard

Any plans to repeat it (with or without pictures)? The pictures are great considering it was your first time and I'm sure you were a little "distracted" all the way through, but maybe you could have done with a bit more light?

Thanks again, glad to see another convert

[jon42]

I hope the Mr doesnt see these pics, I am not purchasing wellies

Nice pics

Too late.

Great pics too, sounlds like a good time was had

[ragingplum]

Muckypup - We are definitely doing it again, maybe different foods, outfits, who knows. And I've already got my hands on a tripod for next time, which should make it easier to strike a balance between tastefully low lighting and being able to see what's going on! Thank you for your kind compliments, gratefully received by both of us!

Jon42 - Thanks Jon, think I can say the same about your latest pics! Definitely go for wellies next time...