Mark Lomas- A real problem

[jpied]

hi there and thanks for all you two

Just wanted to say that this is why we find so many women join forums with enthusiasum just to leave deflated and suspicious. Its been happening for years and its a sad thing for me (a serious but shy splosher who has been lurking for years). Thanks for all those brave women who do this stuff in the face of the crap that happens and calm it for those pricks who fuck it up for everyone else.

All the best
J

[DecadentDoll]

thanks jpied, you're an angel and im sure all the girls would agree

dd xxx

[slimeysophie]

Yup! A true angel! Thanks

[jpied]

personally I think i have asked quite a few people for yahoo addresses over the years - i just quite like chatting on there - band maybe I have got a bit "keen" in certain situations - I like to think how people look but i have never asked for phone numbers (as far as I can remember) or thought that that was reasonable. I would love to chat to people more in depth about sploshing or meet with people (never made the london meets yet) with some understanding of peoples restrictions - its a secret life for many of us! Lets keep the crap out of it and have fun. There are mostly good peple around but like everything there are some idiots who spoilt and they annoy me to the nth degree...

Right lets lighten up!
J

[jpied]

Bliemy - i hope that make sense in a drunken way!

[BillShipton]

Okay, since none of this happened on our forum but on a messenger service, I think we have done our duty and warned everyone about how to behave on them. Giving out phone numbers, even mobiles is madness. Hayley won't even use a webcam - but that's probably a vanity thing (it would take too long to get ready!).

There is a lot of fun to be had in chatrooms, on IM services and in forums (fora?) but take sensible precautions. You have never met these people afterall. I am sorry Sophie had such a rough introduction to chatting on MSN but hopefully that guy has been dealt with - and it will act as a warning to anyone else in future.

I think this thread has done its bit now, so hopefully we can all move on.

Thanks to all who rallied round.

Bill

[Woofwoof]

I thought hippos were a beautiful, rare and endangered species in the UK?

Seriously though, if he turns up again, tell him not to contact you and ignore him from then on out. Don't give him the satisfaction. Save any original emails and IM usernames / timestamps - unless he knows what he's doing (and reading those logs, I doubt he can do that, and many other things), he can be tracked down if it should ever come to that.

Above all else, don't let it get you down. The rest of us love your input and would hate to see it ruined by some dickless fuckwit.

[slimeysophie]

Thanks everyone. And thanks Bill. I hope it has done enough now.

Thanks

[kombat132]

You know it really saddens me that something as fun and carefree as splosh could be attacked by this sort of thing, but i guess as i brings out the best in some people it can also bring out the worst. one thing i noticed about those messages is that unless there was some kind of mistake with he copy and pasting he did seem to repeat himself a fair bit which made me think. i have seen things like his before and he seems to be saying a few phrases repeatedly which suggests that (im into speculation here) that those are the phrases that he is getting off on, which is almost concrete proof for power games, which by deffinition are just games to the guy and are very rarely acted upon even if they are seriously messed up like the school thing and the driving test stuf, i have no idea about that. so even though i think i now sound like a total sciency egghead by accident i hope that in some small way youll feel a bit better about it plus if the messages were on msn or something similar, next time (if there is a next time...hopefully not) add someone else to the conversation, or a whole bunch of people, or the whole wam communtiy thats currently online to give him a piece of their mind.

btw first post for me, hey everyone

[QuickSlime69]

I too thought I would come out of my long time lurking of these forums to lend my support to both DecadentDoll and slimeysophie.

But also to speak directly to you Lomas and I have no doubt that you browse these forums.

Get psychiatric help as these outbursts of threats and intimidation which you do because somebody hurt you when you were ickle may have worked before but your going to wind up behind bars if you carry on this way.

If you've not had enough of a power rush, how about you listen to these powers. Did you know that under the UK Terrorism Act 2000 that you can be stopped and searched and arrested and detained for 48 hours without the need of a warrant? You maybe why I'm telling you this and whether this is relevant. Well as it just so happens it is very relevant.

Let's take a look more closely at that Act shall we, you couldn't possibly be commiting an act of terrorism could you:

Quoting From Part 1, Section 1, Subsections 1 and 2 of the Act

"1. Terrorism: interpretation

(1) In this Act “terrorism” means the use or threat of action where—
(a) the action falls within subsection (2),

(2) Action falls within this subsection if it—
(a) involves serious violence against a person,
(b) involves serious damage to property,
(c) endangers a person’s life, other than that of the person committing the action,"

Well it appears that by threatening violence against both DecadentDoll and slimeysophie and her parents and her car that you have been commiting an act of terrorism. Now the question is could you be charged, arrested and prosecuted under this act? He's the exciting part, you can!

Quoting From Part 6, Section 58, Subsections 1, 2 and 4 of the Act

"58. Collection of information

(1) A person commits an offence if—
(a) he collects or makes a record of information of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism, or
(b) he possesses a document or record containing information of that kind.
(2) In this section “record” includes a photographic or electronic record.

(4) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable—
on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years, to a fine or to both,"

Well would you look at that, those little facts that you dug up to use as scare tactics, that by you knowing them and making that clear is what could put you behind bars for ten years. Oh and the best bit, you maybe aware of that certain parts of the act that human rights activists complain about as being an infringement of the suspects rights, you know the search and arrest without a warrant, the right for the authorities to f*** up your life, that kind off thing well only certain terrorist suspects can be treated that way under the act. The good news is that you qualify for the special no rights treatment.

Quoting From Part 5 (which deals with special counter terrorism powers), Section 40, Subsection 1 of the Act (this is the bit determining if you qualify)

"40 Terrorist: interpretation

(1) In this Part “terrorist” means a person who—
(a) has committed an offence under any of sections 11, 12, 15 to 18, 54 and 56 to 63,"

If you look the offence that you commited is in section 58 which counts in that part of 56 to 63.

You may not be in the UK and so think this is irrelevant but just think about it for the moment. In the current global political climate how much do you think that your government would co-operate with the UK government pursuing Terrorism charges. You may think that this is an empty threat and the you wouldn't be found guilty, do you really think that would be the end of it. If you have a job you'd lose it and if you wanted to get a good job there simple background check would show that you were once arrested as a suspected terrorist and I don't think that will be of any help now would it. And if you think that the police might find this as being blown out of proportions do you really think that they would risk any media coverage that they failed to follow up on a breach of the Terrorism act, I can almost see the front page of the Sun right now. And if you think that that is you only problem your also guilty as sin when it comes to the Malicious Communications Act as well as a few others that I've not mentioned.

I'll repeat what I said at the start, get psychiatric help. Stop with your intimidation games or you'll find yourself in deep trouble one day see this as a kick up the arse from reality.

Back to the rest of the forum members now. I would just like to add that I'm morally opposed to many of the powers allow by the Terrorism act I just thought that reality would be the biggest deterrent. I regret that my first post here had to be so heavy handed, provocative and aggressive in nature but I felt it was necessary. I hope you don't use this as first impressions, I would be grateful if you waited a couple of posts (I promise to be more fun and that I'll keep all future provocative comments purely sexual ) before you come to the conclusion that I'm a crazy, idiotic, pain in the arse, thank you.

[Peter Thomas]

Turning the tables is often fun. I've been intimidated in the past by various internet trolls, but I tend to look at their game, and turn it around, use it against them.

If Mark Lomas is his real name, you can start by registering a cheap domain - say mark-lomas.com - and litter it with the details on what he is like with women (ie: socially inadequate and mentally ill from what I've seen).

Potential employers and even friends and family may come across this! Already when you Google on "Mark Lomas" you end up with a UMD thread detailing this little slimeball.

It's also not too hard to find out personal information on HIM. Whne someone was picking on me, I looked in the right places to get info on them. Google can yield a minefield of personal info! If you're determined enough, revenge can be sweet.

[Etonman]

Turning the tables is often fun. I've been intimidated in the past by various internet trolls, but I tend to look at their game, and turn it around, use it against them.

If Mark Lomas is his real name, you can start by registering a cheap domain - say mark-lomas.com - and litter it with the details on what he is like with women (ie: socially inadequate and mentally ill from what I've seen).

Potential employers and even friends and family may come across this! Already when you Google on "Mark Lomas" you end up with a UMD thread detailing this little slimeball.

It's also not too hard to find out personal information on HIM. Whne someone was picking on me, I looked in the right places to get info on them. Google can yield a minefield of personal info! If you're determined enough, revenge can be sweet.

I agree that this prick Lomas deserves everything he gets, but as a general rule, I'd be a bit careful about taking revenge on someone by using public tactics on the internet. If it goes wrong, you could easily find yourself in trouble with the relevent powers-that-be (libel, slander, or whatever??).

I'd keep it simple by reporting Master Lomas to the correct authorities and let them take action officially.

QuickSlime69 makes good points...the laws he quotes are there, let them be used.

[Woofwoof]

If Mark Lomas is his real name

And right there is a major problem. "Proper" identity theft is on the up these days, but right now, anyone can provide any name on IM chat or forums. You could very well be retaliating against an uninvolved 3rd party.

[DecadentDoll]

I think all that can be said, has been said. Thanks to the guys who stopped lurking to come contribute to this thread. Please, don't be strangers, keep on posting.

Lets bring back happy sploshland now.

Bye Bye Thread.

Decadent Doll
xxx