New poll for desperate girls peeing themselves

[BillShipton]

In the good old days of Splosh Magazine ( may it rest in peas!) there always seemed to be a rather snooty attitude to knicker wetting. I always got the impression that Bill really did not like such things, and as it was his magazine the editorial feel seemed to express this view.

When the Australian magazine (Wetset) sought to advertise in Splosh I understand that they were told, advertise if you like, but you will not get much of a responce. They advertised, and recieved a tidal wave of responces (pun was intended!)

I certainly didn't have a snooty attitude to knicker wetting but sadly some commercial outlets and the whole of Canada at that time did. When we published Hayley's spread on knickerwetting (Splosh! No 34, thanks for asking), the Canadians refused to allow it through customs. One or two of our more mainstream outlets were also unhappy at it. I thought it was a shame as knickerwetting (as opposed to full-on water sports) seemed like a perfecly acceptable form of wetlook to me. Now, I am happy to say, more people seem to take this view though (as Hayley mentioned earlier) some credit card billing companies are still very muh against it.

As for Wet Set, we never told them not to expect a response purely not to rely on one (that's how hard sell we are!), and far from frowning on them and their enterprise they went on to be our credit card providers (under the name of Ozbill) very happily for several years. We were very sorry when they had to stop this service after being let down by one of their CC clients as they were very efficient and tolerant of all forms of mess.

Bill

[squirtuk]

I stand corrected on my comments.

I would comment that even when I posted it I was wondering if the attutude I had percieved was based more on a hard financial stand point, rather than a sexual prefference thing.

However it was the feeling I had at the time.

I have always thought it a bit of shame that a harmless bit of fun should be considered so disgusting and evil by our prurient censors, and other powers that be!

On the up side it does add to the delight of doing something so naughty (a theme I touched on in a previous thread on this board) on the down side it makes soucing and buying material difficult and expensive.

The other thing I have noticed is that although such material is considered pornographic, in general pornographers don't want to cover the subject. either Knicker wetting, or wet clothing, quickly without moving away from the areas we love. They might dabble occasionaly, but the model is usually out of her clothes so quickly, (or very scantilly dressed to begin with) there is generally no wet clothing action for us to enjoy.

Thank God for Splosh, who actually brought the whole wet clothing subject into mainstream arena, and by default spawned the knicker wetting offshoots, that have been nutured by ther parties.

[Spinynorman and Frilly]

Well, folks, here's my penny's worth.

Would you be spending it by any chance?

[matt2matt2002]

Ouch - so sharp!

Watch out you don't cut yourself!

[Bruce]

Just another wet Session with a friend.