When having a good panty filling session what type of pants do you like to wear. Myself I love the type in the photo.
Big to hold lots of mess.
Tight legs to keep the mess where it belongs.
Tight fitting to squeeze it into all the right places.
Made of a material that will gradually soak up the mess.
Can,t see the point of thongs and skimpy pants that hold no mess.
Come on Hayley give us all treat and show us just how much you could pour into a pair like that.
What are your favourite types of underwear
They look like quality WAMming pants! The tighter around the leg and the more they can hold the better in my opinion.
I hope someone takes up the gauntlet and shows us how much they can make them hold
I hope someone takes up the gauntlet and shows us how much they can make them hold

-
muckypup - Posts: 1691 [ View ]
- Joined: 24 Apr 2006, 21:22
- Location: Cheshire, UK
- Fetlife: muckipup
- UMD: muckypup
Try sealing the legs with duck tape, to get a tablespoon or two more filling into panty.
Nice pic, but the model is a trifle to young for my taste.




Nice pic, but the model is a trifle to young for my taste.



you've been bulbed
- the bulber
- Posts: 293 [ View ]
- Joined: 24 Apr 2006, 19:11
- Location: uk
were did you get the photo from?
As I sail around the world, will I find the messest girl in the land?
-
slavetogunge - Posts: 223 [ View ]
- Joined: 20 Jun 2006, 20:10
- Location: cornwall,
Phantom wrote:Functionally they're great - but not very sexy. I like a woman to wear knickers that are sexy and also hold quite a lot of mess.
Yeah I was going to qualify my earlier point, I think the question was about underwear to WAM in, not to look at. I wouldn't mind seeing underwear like this in sets, but I'd prefer more sexy knickers

-
muckypup - Posts: 1691 [ View ]
- Joined: 24 Apr 2006, 21:22
- Location: Cheshire, UK
- Fetlife: muckipup
- UMD: muckypup
I get it.
In that case ... if how they look doesn't matter, and only what they'll hold ... then the ultimate WAM-wear must shurely by a pair of fisherman's waders! They'd more or less hold a bathful of custard.
I prefer a balance of the two - sexy to look at, able to hold a few cans of spaghetti or rice pudding.
These are some knickers I think fit that description:
In that case ... if how they look doesn't matter, and only what they'll hold ... then the ultimate WAM-wear must shurely by a pair of fisherman's waders! They'd more or less hold a bathful of custard.
I prefer a balance of the two - sexy to look at, able to hold a few cans of spaghetti or rice pudding.
These are some knickers I think fit that description:
Ah good! A new debate!
I agree entirely about thongs etc but so many professional models turn up with nothing else! Fortunately Poundstretcher do good Big Pants.
Combining size and sexiness, can I suggest the schoolgirl knickers we filled with no less than three litres of custard for Top Sploshing Gear in Splosh! or how about those satin french nickers/nappy pants with elasticated legs (so much nicer than duct tape) available on Ebay (usually for sissies).
Will attach pics if I find them later!
PS There is no way, Hayley would wear the first pair. Too surgical by far!
PPS Don't forget the clear plastic version of the satin pants mentioned earlier filled by Emma in Messy Missies. They held gallons!
I agree entirely about thongs etc but so many professional models turn up with nothing else! Fortunately Poundstretcher do good Big Pants.
Combining size and sexiness, can I suggest the schoolgirl knickers we filled with no less than three litres of custard for Top Sploshing Gear in Splosh! or how about those satin french nickers/nappy pants with elasticated legs (so much nicer than duct tape) available on Ebay (usually for sissies).
Will attach pics if I find them later!
PS There is no way, Hayley would wear the first pair. Too surgical by far!
PPS Don't forget the clear plastic version of the satin pants mentioned earlier filled by Emma in Messy Missies. They held gallons!
- Attachments
-
- f158_1.JPG (20.59 KiB) Viewed 8528 times
-
BillShipton - Posts: 4371 [ View ]
- Joined: 23 Apr 2006, 20:21
- Location: Sunny St Leonards-on-Sea
Those big bloomers? They're like something out of the 1920's Bill!!!!
Maybe if we invent a new sub-genre: Granny WAM
To be honest I don't obsess too much over how much knickers can hold ... I like to see it pour out the sides and down a girls legs anyway.
A tin or two of beans is plenty capacity for this WAM fan!
Maybe if we invent a new sub-genre: Granny WAM
To be honest I don't obsess too much over how much knickers can hold ... I like to see it pour out the sides and down a girls legs anyway.
A tin or two of beans is plenty capacity for this WAM fan!
Slavetogunge asked where the photo came from.
http://www.nicoletapics.com/zg7m06/d04- ... oleta.html
http://www.nicoletapics.com/zg7m06/d04- ... oleta.html
Bikini bottoms would of course be our favourite but we have also both used see-thru plastic pants. They were great fun being able to see everything squelching about and of course I love to see Frilly nude underneath them. She is of course able to see the effect the whole thing is having on me as well. 

Kind regards, Spinynorman and Frilly
Still messing about after all these years!
Still messing about after all these years!
-
Spinynorman and Frilly - Posts: 1601 [ View ]
- Joined: 14 May 2006, 14:22
- Location: In the bath.
65 posts
• Page 1 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests