Page 1 of 1

Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

PostPosted: 25 Nov 2010, 11:10
by BillShipton
Hi

Our hosts tell us they have 'fixed' the problems that have been causing our disappearance over the last week or so. We shall see. The Pup is working on getting it to look the way it did.

Our apologies to all those who (like me) have been frustrated by a frequent absences.

Bill

Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

PostPosted: 25 Nov 2010, 11:15
by Candy Custard
Thanks for the update Bill, hope it stays back for good now xxxx

Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

PostPosted: 25 Nov 2010, 12:33
by Miss T
BillShipton wrote:Our hosts tell us they have 'fixed' the problems.....Our apologies to all those who (like me) have been frustrated by a frequent absences.

Bill


Hosts....*mutter, mutter, mutter* I know exactly how you feel...

Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

PostPosted: 25 Nov 2010, 14:57
by iainecgunge
Probably jinxing ECgunge by saying this, but we've had a good run of late with ours... Although they do moan a bit because our forum is huge (they've upped the size limit for forums I think largely as a result of us!) Hardly my fault people keep posting, indeed if they didn't our hosts would be getting paid as we'd have nothing to host! Nothing more annoying than trying to view your own site and discovering it's not there.

Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

PostPosted: 25 Nov 2010, 22:40
by Richard
I don't care what it looks like so long as it doesn't go away altogether. Although I might be away myself for a little while so please don't think I have abandoned you all :) .

(You can say good riddance if you like! :P )

Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

PostPosted: 26 Nov 2010, 09:19
by BillShipton
We'll miss you, Richard!

Note to everyone else: Yippee. No worrying about the niceties of grammar for a while!

Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

PostPosted: 27 Nov 2010, 23:11
by Richard
BillShipton wrote:We'll miss you, Richard!

Note to everyone else: Yippee. No worrying about the niceties of grammar for a while!

I heard that!
When I return from my professorial tour of the ancient empires of the Mediterranean I shall expect your essays to be ready for marking! Anyone failing to do so may expect a visit to one of the stern mistresses of this academy for appropriate punishment.
Shipton magnus; do not expect that your status as prefect (now known as 'moderator')will exempt you from disciplinary action. Report immediately to the games mistress, Madame Hayley!

Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

PostPosted: 28 Nov 2010, 00:02
by andy250
Have a good time Rich.

regards

Andy and the team.

Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

PostPosted: 28 Nov 2010, 00:18
by WamNick
Glad you are back; hopefully for good - I don't care much for "the other place"

Welcome Back ! - oh that's another song by John Sebastian...

Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

PostPosted: 28 Nov 2010, 12:11
by BillShipton
Oh God, we are probably now obliged to pay some money to Gary Barlow! Tough, Gary!

Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

PostPosted: 28 Nov 2010, 12:40
by WamNick
BillShipton wrote:Oh God, we are probably now obliged to pay some money to Gary Barlow! Tough, Gary!


Sorry Bill ! - have amended post

Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

PostPosted: 28 Nov 2010, 13:35
by BillShipton
I was only joking! The chances of him finding it are somewhat small!

Re: Back for Good? (No, not a Take That thread)

PostPosted: 29 Nov 2010, 15:23
by WamNick
BillShipton wrote:I was only joking! The chances of him finding it are somewhat small!



Thanks Bill - still you don't want to mess with the BMI, SESAC, ASCAP or the PRS. I should have known better from my days working for the BBC.