The jelly question

Chat, flirt and fantasise about everything wet and messy

The jelly question

Postby matt2matt2002 » 29 Aug 2009, 15:32

Did anyone else catch this piece in the current edition of New Scientist?

This week's question
SPLODGE...
I was having a discussion with my mates about what would happen if you filled a swimming pool with jelly and jumped in. Some of the group believe that you would sit happily on the surface. Others, myself included, reckon you would sink, and risk drowning as the jelly collapsed around you. We wouldn't want anyone to be harmed, so we don't recommend experimenting to find out. But do any New Scientist readers have a theoretical answer to the question?
Ross
Bristol


Perhaps some member here may already have the answer?

I would think it gets down to the specific gravity of the jelly and how big an arse one has!

Your answers and reasons here folks – but next weeks edition of New Scientist should have the boffins theories.
I think sex is better than logic
but I can't prove it.
User avatar
matt2matt2002
 
Posts: 980 [ View ]
Joined: 24 Aug 2006, 09:39
Location: Scotland, the Splosh centre of the world - not.

Re: The jelly question

Postby BillShipton » 29 Aug 2009, 16:19

I like New Scientist and the pleb version Focus for exactly this sort of question. It is also brilliant at discounting urban myths...
User avatar
BillShipton
 
Posts: 4371 [ View ]
Joined: 23 Apr 2006, 20:21
Location: Sunny St Leonards-on-Sea

Re: The jelly question

Postby Richard » 29 Aug 2009, 18:29

I'm sure I've seen this on a kid's TV science programme but I can't remember the correct word, it's not viscosity but is something like that. There are certain substances, jelly might well be one of them, which will easily support the weight of a man as he runs across the surface but once the surface tension is breached it behaves as a liquid.

Now I'm going to walk on water, allegedly it's been done before :roll: :roll: :wink: :lol: :? :lol:
Bottoms Up!
User avatar
Richard
 
Posts: 2201 [ View ]
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:42
Location: Southampton UK

Re: The jelly question

Postby splosherrob » 29 Aug 2009, 19:43

Richard wrote:I'm sure I've seen this on a kid's TV science programme but I can't remember the correct word, it's not viscosity but is something like that. There are certain substances, jelly might well be one of them, which will easily support the weight of a man as he runs across the surface but once the surface tension is breached it behaves as a liquid.

Now I'm going to walk on water, allegedly it's been done before :roll: :roll: :wink: :lol: :? :lol:


A non-newtonian fluid, I believe. Everyone's favourite, custard, is one! When impacted it behaves as a solid, but when treated more gently it acts as a liquid. Brainiac did it in an outdoor swimming pool in series 1, then brought it back later as a weekly feature. Don't think jelly behaves the same though. Pretty sure the weight of most humans would break the surface tension and they would sink.
On Fetlife as Luchador1
User avatar
splosherrob
 
Posts: 29 [ View ]
Joined: 01 Mar 2009, 21:47

Re: The jelly question

Postby the_dunker » 29 Aug 2009, 20:27

It all depends on the amount of gelatin in the jelly. If there's a low proportion of gelatin the jelly will be watery and thin so you'd effectively start to sink. If there's a high proportion of gelatin the jelly is thicker and you MAY be supported by it, but you'd stand more chance of being supported if you were to lay down on it rather than stand on it due to the greater surface are you'd cover resulting in a reduced amount of pressure from mass.

Those of you who've seen vodka jelly will know it's more likely to be runny as people put too much vodka into it in proportion to the amount of gelatin.

It's quite likely that the temperature would also be a factor as the warmer the jelly gets the lower its density and the more likely you'd be to sink.

So the best way to try this would would be with a tall, waif-like supermodel in a very chilly pool and some volunteers to carefully place her on the jelly.

With regards to the custard example, I know the gadget show did something on it earlier in the year with Gail Porter. I don't think jelly is a non-newtonian fluid in the same way as it is solid, in normal conditions (and with enough gelatin).
Splosh-a-Girl veteran - Honey B, Scarlett, Shay Hendrix, Tori and Jess West
User avatar
the_dunker
 
Posts: 42 [ View ]
Joined: 03 May 2008, 17:35
Location: UK

Re: The jelly question

Postby La Perla » 30 Aug 2009, 13:40

I think it might work if you mixed the jelly with cornflour [cornstarch] as the thickening agent along with gelatin. This would also make the jelly cloudy and more viscous, perhaps, this would be better for sploshing.
Arrowroot would thicken the jelly without the cloudiness but I 'm not sure about the qualities of the resultant mass.
What fun finding out.
With suitably dressed laboratory assistants of course. Maybe Abby from NCIS could be in attendance.
Make every day a messy day.
La Perla
 
Posts: 65 [ View ]
Joined: 03 May 2007, 12:05
Location: London

Re: The jelly question

Postby eden » 31 Aug 2009, 17:29

Great thread! I think someone would probably break the surface of the jelly and sink.

On another matter, Jon makes perfectly set vodka jellies, despite being teetotal. Perfect boyfriend and scientist ;)
Love, Eden

On fetlife as eden_blue
User avatar
eden
 
Posts: 517 [ View ]
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 01:03
Location: London

Re: The jelly question

Postby wampony » 31 Aug 2009, 17:56

This type of thing is why I love this forum.
Don't know the answer but I sure wish I could have a go at finding it out :lol: :lol:
We'll have to drink our way out of this
User avatar
wampony
 
Posts: 184 [ View ]
Joined: 21 Jan 2009, 20:55
Location: in my stable

Re: The jelly question

Postby Richard » 31 Aug 2009, 18:06

Thank you splosherrob! "Non-newtonian fluid" is exactly what I was groping for through the effects of red wine :oops:
Bottoms Up!
User avatar
Richard
 
Posts: 2201 [ View ]
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:42
Location: Southampton UK

Re: The jelly question

Postby andy250 » 31 Aug 2009, 18:10

eden wrote:Great thread! I think someone would probably break the surface of the jelly and sink.

On another matter, Jon makes perfectly set vodka jellies, despite being teetotal. Perfect boyfriend and scientist ;)


Goodman Jon...... Bring somewith to the next meet, I'm sure we'd take the time to sample.........


regards

Andy
andy250
 
Posts: 4586 [ View ]
Joined: 13 May 2006, 19:56
Location: Manchester

Re: The jelly question

Postby Richard » 31 Aug 2009, 18:16

I'm not very keen on jelly so can I just have the vodka please :D
Bottoms Up!
User avatar
Richard
 
Posts: 2201 [ View ]
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:42
Location: Southampton UK

Re: The jelly question

Postby BillShipton » 31 Aug 2009, 22:44

Mouse eats vodka jelly for breakfast! And being very small could probably walk on it. Personally I like jelly and I like vodka but not the combination, smacks of lilly gilding!
User avatar
BillShipton
 
Posts: 4371 [ View ]
Joined: 23 Apr 2006, 20:21
Location: Sunny St Leonards-on-Sea

Re: The jelly question

Postby jon42 » 31 Aug 2009, 22:59

andy250 wrote:
eden wrote:Great thread! I think someone would probably break the surface of the jelly and sink.

On another matter, Jon makes perfectly set vodka jellies, despite being teetotal. Perfect boyfriend and scientist ;)


Goodman Jon...... Bring somewith to the next meet, I'm sure we'd take the time to sample.........


regards

Andy


I put it down to being teetotal, I made it with the intention of it making jelly rather than being super strong.

And I think you'd sink in set jelly since it is a solid, although you can probably make it to varying toughness, and maybe with enough gelatin you'd make something a bit more like rubber than what you'd usually think of as jelly.

Incidenally, I think you'd probably float in unset jelly mix, while it's still liqud, since it'd probably have properties like salt water due to a slightly higher density...
User avatar
jon42
 
Posts: 276 [ View ]
Joined: 04 Jan 2008, 04:59
Location: London, UK

Re: The jelly question

Postby BillShipton » 01 Sep 2009, 08:33

And semi-unset jelly would feel a lot nicer too!
User avatar
BillShipton
 
Posts: 4371 [ View ]
Joined: 23 Apr 2006, 20:21
Location: Sunny St Leonards-on-Sea

Re: The jelly question

Postby matt2matt2002 » 02 Sep 2009, 18:31

Thank you folks for passing on your thoughts,
As soon as the next New Scientist hits the stands and give you all the boffins answers.
I think sex is better than logic
but I can't prove it.
User avatar
matt2matt2002
 
Posts: 980 [ View ]
Joined: 24 Aug 2006, 09:39
Location: Scotland, the Splosh centre of the world - not.

Next

Return to General WAM Banter

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 12 guests