Page 1 of 1

What's with the lack of straight up butter?

PostPosted: 07 Jun 2009, 05:31
by grungyartist
I'd think it'd be a little more common than it is, considering how cheap and easy to come by it is. But I do not actually see many sets using plain old butter on any sites period. I can't imagine it being the yuck factor either as there's much more icky things to be found in WAM. (I'm looking at you, manure.) Then I have to ask, where is all the butter at?

Re: What's with the lack of straight up butter?

PostPosted: 07 Jun 2009, 05:33
by Spinynorman and Frilly
You do have a point although you do see margarine shampoos now and again. Didn't Last Tango In Paris use some butter? :mrgreen:

Re: What's with the lack of straight up butter?

PostPosted: 07 Jun 2009, 06:38
by bogjumper
Probably becuase being so greasy it's very hard to clean up?

Taking your example of manure, that'll wash off with straight water - not even warm - whereas with butter you'd have to use a very strong soap which might give skin reactions to some.

Same reason people use baby oil rather than cooking oil. One's designed to go on skin, the other isn't.

Not that we don't appreciate the use of things that aren't meant to go on the skin, of course :lol:

Re: What's with the lack of straight up butter?

PostPosted: 07 Jun 2009, 08:52
by BillShipton
Butter is far greasier than marge and therefore harder to clean off (especially in the hair). It is also a lot more expensive! So, we have stuck to the artificial stuff as you will see soon in another Tigerr film (which will never make it to Youtube!)

Bill

Re: What's with the lack of straight up butter?

PostPosted: 07 Jun 2009, 13:22
by Spinynorman and Frilly
Have to say that Tigerr is an outstanding talent. :mrgreen:

Can't wait to see that one Bill.

As for margarine we have used it a lot and it is very thick and gloopy and is nice and slimy too. Great for filling a bikini up with and leaves you shiny and slippery. :)

Re: What's with the lack of straight up butter?

PostPosted: 07 Jun 2009, 17:53
by AliciaBond
I did a set with butter a while back. It was kinda weird, not as sexy as I thought it would feel, though I would certainly do it again. I think the butter needs to be much more melted than mine was... the lumps really dont work! Quite tempted to retry this set with a much smoother buttermelt... what do you think?

Alicia xx

Re: What's with the lack of straight up butter?

PostPosted: 07 Jun 2009, 23:01
by DungeonMasterOne
I think that putting butter into clothes could possibly be fun. Dress in a swimsuit, drop some nice fridge-cold blocks of butter down the front and back, put normal clothes, say jeans and t-shirt, on over the suit, and then go out for a nice secluded walk on a hot day, and see what happens as it melts? Probably not so good for photos, but I think it'd feel amazing as it slowly liquified and ran, flowing over skin and soaking into the clothes.

Re: What's with the lack of straight up butter?

PostPosted: 08 Jun 2009, 04:47
by rich_d_rich
Crisco is good (and it comes off with lots of shower gel).

So is beef dripping, I discovered, especially if you nuke it till its melted then let it get cool enough for comfort (or not, if you're into pain as well...)