Page 1 of 2

Girls Messed Up In The Stocks

PostPosted: 26 Oct 2008, 03:16
by MessClub
We are planning some new sets very soon and we are after some feedback. Do you just like the sets we do like lucky buckets or would you want us to dable with girls bound/restrained and messed?

The pics attached are part of a messy private session we were involved in so not studio quality but may help test the water to see if its popular on here.

Any general feeback on what you would like to see in our sets would help too.


Credit to Mistress Cane and the AOD for kindly hosting the session :D

PostPosted: 26 Oct 2008, 08:32
by Spinynorman and Frilly
Some nice bikinis there, what you can see of them. :P

PostPosted: 26 Oct 2008, 10:20
by latexcrossdresser
these are some very good pictures!there's nothing wrong seeing a beautiful female in bondage and getting messed up :D
you could try several different bondage positions say a hogtie and serveral different bondage toys eg stocks,spreader bars etc
also would be nice to see different clothing being worn....some nice lingerie,one piece swimsuits,formal dresses etc then i think you could be on to a winner......

stocks

PostPosted: 26 Oct 2008, 10:32
by christh
Good to see these really are stocks, and not a pillory.

The stocks are an item of mild chastisement, so why are the girls in bikinis? They should be normally dressed, and first soaked before gradual stripping and gunging.

Just a thought.

You need some men to apply the punishment. Can I help?

Boing! :D

Re: stocks

PostPosted: 26 Oct 2008, 16:31
by matt2matt2002
[quote="christh"]Good to see these really are stocks, and not a pillory.

Sorry to be a bore - coz I know this was covered a few months ago - but what is the difference?

Is one for heads n hands and 'tother for feets?
:?

PostPosted: 26 Oct 2008, 16:33
by morepies
Bless, my soul, is that Sploshman I can see mucking in again!

Excellent pics :)

PostPosted: 26 Oct 2008, 17:35
by PleasePieMeMistress
Stocks are normally applied in a seated position to feet and hands. Different variations have hand holes at the front by the feet or at the sides by the seat.

A pillory is normally upright with holes for head and hands with the victim standing in a bent position.

PostPosted: 26 Oct 2008, 20:07
by MessClub
christh wrote:Good to see these really are stocks, and not a pillory.
The stocks are an item of mild chastisement, so why are the girls in bikinis? They should be normally dressed, and first soaked before gradual stripping and gunging.

They are in bikinis because that was the most suitable dress for the multiple scenarios we had and there was just enough time for showering not changing. They were involed in pie/gunge games and wrestling too so bikinis suited the mix best. Good point though christh as for the professional sets in the studio we will be going down the normally dressed route :wink:

morepies wrote:Bless, my soul, is that Sploshman I can see mucking in again!
Excellent pics :)


Yes that is King Sploshman getting involved again. Think we will have to change the saying "where there's muck there's brass" to "where there's muck there's SPLOSHMAN" lol.

PostPosted: 26 Oct 2008, 20:47
by muckypup
There's nothing wrong with bikinis as Spinynorman and Frilly will attest to :) But each to their own.

For me the bucket series is one of the best sets I have ever seen, but I also have a penchant for a bit of bondage so either would be superb for me. I think the key is great models who are up for it and someone with an eye for it like you clearly do.

PostPosted: 26 Oct 2008, 21:35
by MessClub
muckypup wrote:There's nothing wrong with bikinis as Spinynorman and Frilly will attest to :) But each to their own.

For me the bucket series is one of the best sets I have ever seen, but I also have a penchant for a bit of bondage so either would be superb for me. I think the key is great models who are up for it and someone with an eye for it like you clearly do.


As far as outfits we will always tend to try and match the outfit to the scene. We will be using bikinis again plus more formal wear etc depending on the scene. I think with outfits you can't please everyone all of the time but by putting some thought into matching the scene and the outfits we hope to please most people most of the time.

Thanks for your freeback muckypup we have had lots of good feedback from the bucket series. The lucky buckets set especially was very hard work by a few people to produce content that we hoped people might like. Some people think they are clinical in their depiction and not the like the muck and mahem you would see in a fun session. There is some truth in this as you can see from the pics above, we did this too, and the photographs were more like a few inpromptu snaps of the mayhem.

In my opinion the concept is simple a session is a session and a photoshoot is a photoshoot. We have run both and our conclusion is simply that a session is meant to be fun for all those involved on the day, a few pics of the mayhem make a good record of what went on. A photoshoot if done properly is not fun for those involved, its hard work, my day job is easier if that helps explain it. For these you are not considering the enjoyment of anyone present at the time but the end results. The end results then convey to those who can't always have sessions a visual escape into their chosen fetish. The higher quality the set of pictures is with a good storyline the more real it appears to the viewer who is drawn in as if they were present themselves.

We were going to go down the video route like other producers but have been asked by many to continue producing the stills as people still want to see good pictures.

PostPosted: 26 Oct 2008, 22:36
by Squelch
MessClubSeven wrote:In my opinion the concept is simple a session is a session and a photoshoot is a photoshoot. We have run both and our conclusion is simply that a session is meant to be fun for all those involved on the day, a few pics of the mayhem make a good record of what went on. A photoshoot if done properly is not fun for those involved, its hard work, my day job is easier if that helps explain it. For these you are not considering the enjoyment of anyone present at the time but the end results. The end results then convey to those who can't always have sessions a visual escape into their chosen fetish. The higher quality the set of pictures is with a good storyline the more real it appears to the viewer who is drawn in as if they were present themselves.


Interesting comment...I've never really thought of it like that but I guess your 'photoshoot' is just like any other form of studio photography where the model, the props (gunge) and the lighting all need to look just right. Fascinating! I'd be interested if the other splosh snappers here such as Bill and dids share the same view.

Gimme the session anyday :lol: But then, my snaps of the fun would be nowhere near the quality of your excellent pics.

Oh and I like the stocks/pillory idea...can't beat a bit of mild chastisement and humiliation :lol: I reckon you could do an awesome knickerfilling or swimsuit filling photoshoot too :wink:

PostPosted: 27 Oct 2008, 14:00
by BillShipton
Professional shoots are indeed very different from recording a private shoot. Pro videoing is much slower and we do a lot of stuff on a shot-by-shot basis which is less 'fun' than spontaneous action but ensures you capture everything.

They are hard work BUT they are enormous fun! Working with girls who enjoy what they are doing and get the jokes (as we do) means we wind up making things up as we go along as well as following a script so there is a lot of laughing and joking as we cover up mistakes or think of something funny on the spur of the moment. I think some of that comes across. The hardest 'work' is trying to concentrate on getting the shots right and remembering the storyline when there are naked custard-covered women six feet in front of you!

Bill

PostPosted: 27 Oct 2008, 14:10
by 54321plop
so whats this, Stocks or pillory ?

PostPosted: 27 Oct 2008, 15:15
by BillShipton
Definitely stocks and may I be the first to say we'd like to see some more...

PostPosted: 28 Oct 2008, 06:30
by slapstickfan
Ok Bill. Here are some I found...