Busy month for the Wam Princess! (now with pics!)

View · by **TottyMcGee** » 15 Jul 2006, 10:24

Well done to the pair of you, a fantastic set!

View · by **Hayley** » 15 Jul 2006, 14:00

I seriously hope you and JayPegg have many more sessions and are prepared to share them on the forum or on our free pages. How about doing a Channel Free set, girls?

Hayley

View · by **Spinynorman and Frilly** » 15 Jul 2006, 19:23

Hayley wrote:
How about doing a Channel Free set, girls?

Hayley

But would it feature a bikini again? Get the feeling that it probably wouldn't.

Still, what we have had posted so far was very nice.

View · by **Clare Rose** » 16 Jul 2006, 19:05

Actually, I own a number of differing styles and colours of bikini's (I can see the look of surprise on everyone's faces now!), so it could be possible. I will def be doing another bikini set in the future, maybe a wet set! Or incorporating wet.

Ha, ha, I can see it now, lounging by a tropical pool in a million pound villa in the med, getting snapped by Hello magazine, when suddenly the WAMprincess gets pushed into the pool.
The princess bobs up to the surface with hands on hips and suddenly gets a pie in the face! Brilliant!
Thats the life!

Cx

View · by **Spinynorman and Frilly** » 16 Jul 2006, 19:11

Clare Rose wrote:
Ha, ha, I can see it now, lounging by a tropical pool in a million pound villa in the med

Cx

Was that by any chance a bit of a typo? Surely you meant mud. :wink:

View · by NX » 16 Jul 2006, 23:24

Think you are more likely to be featured in NUTS or ZOO magazine. Though if SPLOSH! was still in print best you would get is a beach hut and deck chair. Wonder how many "99's" your bikinis could hold, and then topped of with raspberry sauce!

Clare keep up the good work but not the bikini tops!

NX

View · by **Hayley** » 17 Jul 2006, 10:58

When I asked about doing a set for Channel Free I meant you AND Jaypegg and in the style of that set not the bikini one. Whilst that was very good, I too prefer more clothing than a bikini to start with.

Love
Hayley

View · by **slavetogunge** » 17 Jul 2006, 13:01

i prefer more clothing then slowly stripping whilst messy to next tp nothing.

is that bad?

View · by **boxster** » 17 Jul 2006, 18:23

Wonderful, Clare!

Totally amazing and wonderful.

Don

View · by **BillShipton** » 17 Jul 2006, 23:13

No, I'm with the lots of clothing stripping to next to nothing brigade.

Starting in a bikini doesn't work for me, personally, and getting wet in a bikini seems pointless as that is what they were made for.

Next week: going out in a light shower wearing a kagoul...

But a nice fully dressed messy set between the two of you would be great.

View · by **Messyman Chris** » 17 Jul 2006, 23:39

Hi Hayley and Clare (please reply!!!!!),

I have been viewing this forum for about a month and did e-mail Clare (WAM Princess) about one of her photosets (the white suit and chocolate one) but got no response. I know she must get thousands of mails. Clare advertised the set of pics for £4 i think on the UMD and asked people to mail if interested. I did'nt have a credit card at the time but now i have so would be very interested in the pics, of what looked like a gorgeous white suit jacket and black skirt.

Would it be possible to post a pic of that set here if the pics are no longer available??????.

When will Clare's site be online, can't wait.

Also, i think the 'ASCOT SET' is just fantastic and one thing all wam producers usually miss out probably apart from Messy Fun, is the hats and the black and pink hats were lovely all gooey, a real great touch.

Hayley, is there any way you could post a pic of Clare's hat getting messy as in the pics you posted it still looked clean. Hope it did get the messy treatment like the black one does.

Always been a fan of the splosh site and bought 12 splosh magazines in 2001 that i still look at regularly and it's great to see you still around since 1989!!!!!!!!.

Thanks for reading,

Messyman Chris XXXXXXX

View · by **BillShipton** » 17 Jul 2006, 23:47

I think Hayley posted all the pics she had (but I will ask her tomorrow).

As for pics from the white suit set, that would be up to the Princess herself and we wouldn't DARE interfere - not that we have the pictures anyway!

View · by NX » 18 Jul 2006, 17:27

In my best Arthur Daley impression "Hey Bill, Wanna buy some pics? LOL!"

Though seriously Her Right Royal Pieness has been quiet recently!

View · by **Spinynorman and Frilly** » 18 Jul 2006, 19:25

A few words in defence of the much maligned bikini.

Bikinis are great fun, most of the time if you are wearing a bikini you are having a good time.

Bikinis are just such a great concept. If you are wearing one in public you are as naked as it is possible to be without being naked.

If you are sploshing in one then you have lots of bits of clothing to fill up and lots of flesh to flash and slime.

Bikinis can be circumnavigated in so many ways and also have a tendency to expose exciting bits of anatomy.

Bikinis come off really easily.

On a personal note in our house a bikini is a red light for fun and frollicks.

Obviously there are lots of other costumes that are fun to play with, allow complex scenarios, add more weight to the body and a sense of fullness, and if you are going to get naked take a lot more time to remove. Also if you don't want to get naked at all then a bikini wouldn't be any good as you are mostly there anyway.

So anyway each to their own of course but please bear in mind that for some the bikini is all things in all ways.

View · by **boxster** » 18 Jul 2006, 21:41

I do think spinynorman and frilly are onto to something. Remember, a bikini does not preclude nudity but enhances the sensations and tease of wam.

Don

Busy month for the Wam Princess! (now with pics!)

Clare and hats!!!!!!!!!!!!

Who is online