Page 1 of 1

Old pictures 2 part 2

PostPosted: 02 Jul 2008, 19:32
by messyalan
Here are the rest for what they are worth

PostPosted: 02 Jul 2008, 19:49
by andy250
Nice too see some stills from the event, thanks for posting them.


regards

Andy

PostPosted: 03 Jul 2008, 00:52
by shredder
For what they are worth?? Pretty darn good as far as I am concerned, messyalan!



8)

PostPosted: 03 Jul 2008, 10:33
by Phantom
Thanks Messyalan!

Any more messy shots?

Bill did give the ok to post a selection of the commercial messy pics ... so long as it's not entire sets. Perhaps a some choice favourite pics from some of your favourite sets?

Phantom

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2008, 16:50
by messyalan
I'm not sure Bill gave permission to post commercial sets as such but I will dig out a few from the Wet Set days. I'm afraid there are no more sldies from that great occasion. I do have some video which I will stick on Youtube when I get time.

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2008, 18:04
by Phantom
Here's what Bill said:

"I am not sure that posting the commercial transparencies in large numbers is a great idea. Some examples of the early Wet Shot days would be appreciated I am sure but whole sets would be taking the piss a bit"

So - no whole sets, but some random examples ok.

Sadly, wetlook does little for me, although I think there are plenty of wetlook fans on the forum. If Bill's also happy for some example messy pics - and you're happy to share - that would be amazing.

Thanks again for everything you've shared so far.

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2008, 19:02
by BillShipton
As very old people like me know, Wet Shots was the name of the original company set up by Mike Ellison which sold transparencies of both messy and wet action. They really were the first in the WAM business. Unfortunately, Mike had some disagreement with his business partner and it folded shortly after. BUT from that grew WSM, so silver lining to the cloud and all that.

I stand by what I said that a few pictures from old commercial sets would be okay so long as they are credited to the original company supplying them (if you can't remember, I might). That would be illustrating their work. Publishing on mass without a credit would be just exploiting their work.

Bill