The Splosh UK Forum

When having a good panty filling session what type of pants do you like to wear. Myself I love the type in the photo.
Big to hold lots of mess.
Tight legs to keep the mess where it belongs.
Tight fitting to squeeze it into all the right places.
Made of a material that will gradually soak up the mess.

Can,t see the point of thongs and skimpy pants that hold no mess.
Come on Hayley give us all treat and show us just how much you could pour into a pair like that.

They look like quality WAMming pants! The tighter around the leg and the more they can hold the better in my opinion.

I hope someone takes up the gauntlet and shows us how much they can make them hold

Functionally they're great - but not very sexy. I like a woman to wear knickers that are sexy and also hold quite a lot of mess.

Try sealing the legs with duck tape, to get a tablespoon or two more filling into panty.

Nice pic, but the model is a trifle to young for my taste.

were did you get the photo from?

Phantom wrote:Functionally they're great - but not very sexy. I like a woman to wear knickers that are sexy and also hold quite a lot of mess.

Yeah I was going to qualify my earlier point, I think the question was about underwear to WAM in, not to look at. I wouldn't mind seeing underwear like this in sets, but I'd prefer more sexy knickers

I get it.

In that case ... if how they look doesn't matter, and only what they'll hold ... then the ultimate WAM-wear must shurely by a pair of fisherman's waders! They'd more or less hold a bathful of custard.

I prefer a balance of the two - sexy to look at, able to hold a few cans of spaghetti or rice pudding.

These are some knickers I think fit that description:

Ah good! A new debate!

I agree entirely about thongs etc but so many professional models turn up with nothing else! Fortunately Poundstretcher do good Big Pants.

Combining size and sexiness, can I suggest the schoolgirl knickers we filled with no less than three litres of custard for Top Sploshing Gear in Splosh! or how about those satin french nickers/nappy pants with elasticated legs (so much nicer than duct tape) available on Ebay (usually for sissies).

Will attach pics if I find them later!

PS There is no way, Hayley would wear the first pair. Too surgical by far!
PPS Don't forget the clear plastic version of the satin pants mentioned earlier filled by Emma in Messy Missies. They held gallons!

Those big bloomers? They're like something out of the 1920's Bill!!!!

Maybe if we invent a new sub-genre: Granny WAM

To be honest I don't obsess too much over how much knickers can hold ... I like to see it pour out the sides and down a girls legs anyway.

A tin or two of beans is plenty capacity for this WAM fan!

Thongs look cool, but hold nothing their is no way you'll be doing any nicker filling if a thong is being worn.!!!!!!!

As sexy as thongs look I would prefer something similar to the sample pic from Brians ex-site, they can still look cool as well as being good for gunging them in.

regards

Andy

BillShipton wrote:I agree entirely about thongs etc but so many professional models turn up with nothing else!

Don't the bus companies object?

Slavetogunge asked where the photo came from.

http://www.nicoletapics.com/zg7m06/d04- ... oleta.html

Anyone else got any favourite knicker filling or messy knickers pictures they'd care to add to this thread?

I was thinking ... when it comes down to it, I find the image of a woman wearing messy knickers much more sexy than a messy naked woman. What do others prefer?

Phantom

Bikini bottoms would of course be our favourite but we have also both used see-thru plastic pants. They were great fun being able to see everything squelching about and of course I love to see Frilly nude underneath them. She is of course able to see the effect the whole thing is having on me as well.