BillShipton wrote:I don't like conventional porn at all to be honest and don't watch it. Not out of moral outrage (hardly!) but purely cos 'beautiful' men and women having sex doesn't really 'involve' me. No, I am not suggesting the attractive girl/ugly bloke scenario which is just delusional, personally watching any bloke at it fails to excite me. Not my age, I've always found it laughable.
I'd go along with Bill on that, I've not a lot of interest in conventional porn these days (not through any moral reason or age, thankfully
). I might sometimes see an especially attractive girl, who for some reason I found particulary appealing, but would often then enjoy seeing her nicely or sexily dressed in glamour-type shots as much (if not more) than necessarily performing in porn.And, in my days in a big business (which was in the days when suppliers could still afford to freely hand out "Glamour" calendars every Christmas! ), it was interesting that the first ones claimed by staff were the ones showing gorgeous girls in glamorous evening dress rather than the more blatent nudey/"tarty" ones. Perhaps the idea of leaving something to the viewer's own imagination?
or "Tony Blair Rocks" emblazoned across your chest! Worst of all are the home made ones using ink pushed into cuts in the skin, perhaps something like "I LUV RICH" with a skull & crossbones!
